Skip to content

Complex Sequences#

Definition: Complex Sequence

A complex sequence is a sequence of complex numbers.

Theorem: Equality of Complex Sequences

Let \((a_n)_{n \in \mathcal{D}}\) and \((b_n)_{n \in \mathcal{D}}\) be infinite complex sequences.

If there exist complex power series \(\sum_{n \in \mathcal{D}} a_n (x - c)^n\) and \(\sum_{n \in \mathcal{D}} b_n (x - c)^n\) which have the same center \(c \in \mathbb{C}\) and for which there is some \(r \gt 0\) such that both series converge to the same number, i.e.

\[ \sum_{n \in \mathcal{D}} a_n (x - c)^n = \sum_{n \in \mathcal{D}} b_n (x - c)^n, \]

when when \(|x - c| \lt r\), then \(a_n = b_n\) for all \(n \in \mathcal{D}\).

Proof

TODO

Convergence#

Definition: Convergence

A complex sequence \((z_n)_{n \in \mathcal{D}}\) converges to the limit \(L \in \mathbb{C}\) if and only if for each \(\varepsilon \gt 0\), there exists some \(N \in \mathcal{D}\) such that

\[ |z_n - L| \lt \varepsilon \qquad \forall n \ge N. \]

Notation

The most common notation is

\[ \lim_{n \to \infty} z_n = L \]

In text, one also writes "\(z_n \to L\) as \(n \to \infty\)" or just "\(z_n \to L\)". Sometimes, one might also encounter \(z_n \underset{n \to \infty}{\longrightarrow} L\) and \(z_n \overset{n \to \infty}{\longrightarrow} L\).

Theorem: Uniqueness of the Limit

The limit of a convergent complex sequence is unique - if \(\{z_n\}\) converges to both \(L\) and \(M\), then \(L = M\).

Proof

Pick some arbitrary \(\varepsilon \gt 0\).

Since \(\{a_n\} \to L\), by definition, there exists some integer \(N_L\) such that

\[ |a_n - L| \lt \varepsilon \qquad \forall n \ge N_L. \]

Similarly, since \(\{a_n\} \to M\), there exists some integer \(N_M\) such that

\[ |a_n - M| \lt \varepsilon \qquad \forall n \ge N_M. \]

Now, let \(N = \max\{N_L, N_M\}\). For all \(n \ge N\), both of the aforementioned inequalities hold. Therefore, for all \(n \ge N\), we have

\[ |L - M| = |L - a_n + a_n - M| \le |L - a_n| + |a_n - M| \lt \varepsilon + \varepsilon = 2\varepsilon. \]

Therefore,

\[ \frac{1}{2}|L - M| \lt \varepsilon \]

So far, the argument does not actually depend on the particular choice of \(\varepsilon\) and is thus true for every \(\varepsilon \gt 0\). This means that \(\frac{1}{2}|L - M|\) is smaller that every positive real number. This is only possible if \(\frac{1}{2}|L - M|\) is zero which is in turn only possible if \(|L - M| = 0\). Therefore, \(L = M\).

Theorem: Complex Convergence via Real Convergence

A complex sequence \((z_n)_{n \in \mathcal{D}}\) converges to \(L \in \mathbb{C}\) the sequence \(|z_n - L|\) converges to \(0\):

\[ \lim_{n \to \infty} z_n = L \iff \lim_{n \to \infty} |z_n - L| = 0 \]
Proof

TODO

Example: \(z_n = \frac{1}{2n} + \frac{n}{n+1}\mathrm{i}\)

We examine the following complex sequence \((z_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}\):

\[ z_n = \frac{1}{2n} + \frac{n}{n+1}\mathrm{i} \]

Since \(\frac{1}{2n} \to 0\) and \(\frac{n}{n+1} \to 1\), we see that \((z_n)\) probably converges to \(\mathrm{i}\). To show this, we examine \(z_n - \mathrm{i}\):

\[ z_n - \mathrm{i} = \frac{1}{2n} + \left(\frac{n}{n+1} -1\right)\mathrm{i} = \frac{1}{2n} + \frac{-1}{n+1}\mathrm{i} \]

We now examine the limit of the absolute values:

\[ \lim_{n\to\infty} |z_n - \mathrm{i}| = \sqrt{\frac{1}{4n^2}+\frac{1}{(n+1)}} = 0 \]

Therefore, \((z_n)\) converges to \(\mathrm{i}\).

Theorem: Component-Wise Convergence

A complex sequence \((z_n)_{n \in \mathcal{D}}\) converges to \(L \in \mathbb{C}\) if and only if the sequences of its real part and its imaginary part converge to the real part and imaginary part of \(L\), respectively.

\[ \lim_{n \to \infty} z_n = L \iff \lim_{n \to \infty} \operatorname{Re}(z_n) = \operatorname{Re}(L) \qquad \text{and} \qquad \lim_{n \to \infty} \operatorname{Im}(z_n) = \operatorname{Im}(L) \]
Proof

TODO

Example: \(z_n = \left(1 - \frac{3}{n}\right)^n + \mathrm{i}\frac{2n^2+3n+5}{n^2+1}\)

We examine the following complex sequence \((z_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\):

\[ z_n = \left(1 - \frac{3}{n}\right)^n + \mathrm{i}\frac{2n^2+3n+5}{n^2+1} \]

Since \(\lim_{n\to\infty} \left(1 - \frac{3}{n}\right)^n = \mathrm{e}^{-3}\) and \(\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{2n^2+3n+5}{n^2+1} = 2\), we know that \((z_n)_{n\to\mathcal{N}}\) converges to \(\mathrm{e}^{-3} + 2\mathrm{i}\):

\[ \lim_{n \to \infty} = \left(1 - \frac{3}{n}\right)^n + \mathrm{i}\frac{2n^2+3n+5}{n^2+1} = \mathrm{e}^{-3}+2\mathrm{i} \]
Example: \(z_n = \frac{5}{n} + (-1)^n\mathrm{i}\)

We examine the following complex sequence \((z_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\):

\[ z_n = \frac{5}{n} +(-1)^n \mathrm{i} \]

Since \(\Im(z_n) = (-1)^n\) diverges, we know that \((z_n)_{n \to\mathbb{N}}\) must also diverge.

Theorem: Cauchy Sequences

A complex sequence \((z_n)_{n \in \mathcal{D}}\) is convergent if and only if for each \(\varepsilon \gt 0\) there exists some \(N \in \mathcal{D}\) such that

\[ \lim_{n \to \infty} |z_n - z_m| = 0 \qquad \forall n,m \ge N \]
Proof

TODO

Note

Sequences for which the above holds, i.e. convergent sequences, are also known as Cauchy sequences.

Theorem: Boundedness of Convergent Sequences

Every convergent complex sequence is bounded.

Proof

Suppose that \(\{a_n\}\) converges to some \(L \in \mathbb{C}\). Then, by definition, for each \(\varepsilon \gt 0\), there exists some integer \(N\) such that

\[ |a_n - L| \lt \varepsilon \qquad \forall n \ge N. \]

Choose \(\varepsilon = 1\). The actual choice is irrelevant, it will just result in a different bound. Then,

\[ |a_n - L| \lt 1 \qquad \forall n \ge N. \]

Let's look at the absolute value of \(a_n\):

\[ |a_n| = |a_n - L + L| \]

Using the triangle inequality, we get

\[ |a_n| = |a_n - L + L| \le |a_n - L| + |L|. \]

For all \(n \ge N\),

\[ |a_n - L| + |L| \lt 1 + |L| \]

and so \(|a_n| \lt 1 + |L|\) for all \(n \ge N\). This means that the modulus of all sequence terms from the \(N\)-th one onwards is less than \(1 + |L|\). Amongst the first \(N-1\) terms of the sequence, choose the one whose modulus \(M\) is greatest. The moduli of the first \(N-1\) terms are thus all less than or equal to \(M\). Essentially, we have

  • \(|a_n| \le M\) for every \(n \lt N\);
  • \(|a_n| \lt 1 + |L|\) for every \(n \ge N\).

Let \(B = \max\{M, 1 + |L|\}\). Therefore, \(|a_n| \le B\) for every integer \(n\) and so \(a_n\) is bounded.

Theorem: Convergence to Zero

A complex sequence \((z_n)_{n \in \mathcal{D}}\) converges to \(0\) if and only if the real sequence \((|z_n|)_{n \in \mathcal{D}}\) of its absolute values converges to \(0\).

\[ \lim_{n \to \infty} z_n = 0 \iff \lim_{n \to \infty} |z_n| = 0 \]
Proof

TODO

Theorem

Let \(\{a_n\}\) and \(\{b_n\}\) be complex sequences.

If \(\{a_n\}\) converges to zero and there exists some integer \(N\) such that \(|b_n| \le |a_n|\) for all \(n \ge N\), then \(\{b_n\}\) also converges to zero.

Proof

TODO

Theorem: Limit Arithmetic

If \((a_n)_{n\in\mathcal{D}}\) and \((b_n)_{n\in\mathcal{D}}\) are both convergent complex sequences, then

\[\begin{aligned}& \lim_{n \to \infty} (\alpha a_n + \beta b_n) = \alpha \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n + \beta \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n \qquad \forall \alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{C} \\ & \lim_{n \to \infty} (a_n \cdot b_n) = \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n \cdot \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n \\ & \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} = \frac{\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n}{\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n}, \qquad \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n \ne 0 \\ & \lim_{n \to \infty} \overline{a_n} = \overline{\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n} \\ & \lim_{n \to \infty} |a_n| = \left|\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n\right|\end{aligned}\]
Proof

Let \(A = \displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n\) and \(B = \displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n\).

Proof of (1):

We have to prove that for each \(\varepsilon \gt 0\), there exists some integer \(N\) such that

\[ |\alpha a_n + \beta b_n - (\alpha A + \beta B)| \lt \varepsilon \qquad \forall n \ge N. \]

The case of \(\alpha = \beta = 0\) is trivial, since then \(|\alpha a_n + \beta b_n - (\alpha A + \beta B)|\) is always zero and is thus smaller than all \(\varepsilon \gt 0\). As for the existence of \(N\) - not only does such an integer \(N\) exist, but there are actually infinitely many such integers, since the inequality holds irrespective of \(N\).

If \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are not zero, choose some arbitrary \(\varepsilon' \gt 0\). Since \(a_n \to A\) and \(b_n \to B\), there exist integers \(N_A\) and \(N_B\) such that

$$
\begin{aligned}

|a_n - A| \lt \varepsilon' \qquad \forall n \ge N_A \

|b_n - B| \lt \varepsilon' \qquad \forall n \ge N_B

\end{aligned}
$$

Let \(N = \max \{N_A, N_B\}\). Then both inequalities hold for every \(n \ge N\). Now, we look at

\[ |\alpha a_n + \beta b_n - (\alpha A + \beta B)| = |\alpha (a_n - A) + \beta (b_n - B)|. \]

By the triangle inequality, we obtain

\[ |\alpha (a_n - A) + \beta (b_n - B)| \le |\alpha (a_n - A)| + |\beta (b_n - B)| = |\alpha| |a_n - A| + |\beta| |b_n - B|. \]

For every \(n \ge N\), we know that \(|a_n - A| \lt \varepsilon'\) and \(|b_n - B| \lt \varepsilon'\) and so we get

\[ |\alpha| |a_n - A| + |\beta| |b_n - B| \lt |\alpha| \varepsilon' + |\beta| \varepsilon'. \]

Since \(|\alpha (a_n - A) + \beta (b_n - B)| \le |\alpha| |a_n - A| + |\beta| |b_n - B|\) and \(|\alpha a_n + \beta b_n - (\alpha A + \beta B)| = |\alpha (a_n - A) + \beta (b_n - B)|\), we get

\[ |\alpha a_n + \beta b_n - (\alpha A + \beta B)| \lt |\alpha| \varepsilon' + |\beta| \varepsilon' \qquad \forall n \ge N \]

So far, the argument does not depend on the choice of \(\varepsilon'\) which means that it must be true for all \(\varepsilon' \gt 0\). Thus, we have proven that for each \(\varepsilon = |\alpha| \varepsilon' + |\beta| \varepsilon'\), there exists some integer, namely \(N\), such that

\[ |\alpha a_n + \beta b_n - (\alpha A + \beta B)| \lt \varepsilon \qquad \forall n \ge N, \]

which is what we set out to prove.

Proof of (2):

We have to prove that for each \(\varepsilon \gt 0\), there exists some integer \(N\) such that

\[ |a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot B| \lt \varepsilon \qquad \forall n \ge N. \]

Choose some arbitrary \(\varepsilon' \gt 0\). Since \(a_n \to A\) and \(b_n \to B\), there exist integers \(N_A\) and \(N_B\) such that

$$
\begin{aligned}

&|a_n - A| \lt \varepsilon' \qquad \forall n \ge N_A \

&|b_n - B| \lt \varepsilon' \qquad \forall n \ge N_B.

\end{aligned}
$$

Let \(N = \max \{N_A, N_B\}\). Then both inequalities hold for all \(n \ge N\). We transform the expression \(|a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot B|\) a bit:

\[ |a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot B| = |a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot b_n + A \cdot b_n - A \cdot B|. \]

Using the triangle inequality, we obtain

\[ |a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot b_n + A \cdot b_n - A \cdot B| \le |a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot b_n| + |A \cdot b_n - A \cdot B|, \]

which is equivalent to

\[ |a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot B| \le |b_n| \cdot |a_n - A| + |A| \cdot |b_n - B|. \]

For all \(n \ge N\),

\[ |b_n| \cdot |a_n - A| + |A| \cdot |b_n - B| \lt |b_n| \cdot \varepsilon' + |A| \cdot \varepsilon', \]

which in turn means that, for all \(n \ge N\),

\[ |a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot B| \lt |b_n| \cdot \varepsilon' + |A| \cdot \varepsilon' \]

Recall that every convergent sequence is bounded. This means that there exists some \(B \gt 0\) and some integer \(\mathcal{N}\) such that \(|b_n| \le B\) for all \(n \ge \mathcal{N}\). Therefore,

\[ |a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot B| \lt B \cdot \varepsilon' + |A| \cdot \varepsilon' \qquad \forall n \ge \mathcal{N}. \]

Set \(\varepsilon = B \cdot \varepsilon' + |A| \cdot \varepsilon'\). Therefore,

\[ |a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot B| \lt \varepsilon \qquad \forall n \ge \mathcal{N}. \]

It is obvious that \(\varepsilon\) can be any positive real number. Moreover, since the argument so far does not depend on any particular choice of \(\varepsilon\), we know the argument holds for all \(\varepsilon \gt 0\). We have thus proven that for each \(\varepsilon \gt 0\), there exists some integer, namely \(\mathcal{N}\), such that

\[ |a_n \cdot b_n - A \cdot B| \lt \varepsilon \qquad \forall n \ge \mathcal{N}, \]

which is what we set out to show.

Proof of (3):

TODO

Proof of (4):

TODO

Proof of (5):

TODO